<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lines and Curves by Patrick Burgaud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netpoetic.com/2009/09/lines-and-curves-by-patrick-burgaud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netpoetic.com/2009/09/lines-and-curves-by-patrick-burgaud/</link>
	<description>exploring digital poetry and electronic literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Burgaud</title>
		<link>http://www.netpoetic.com/2009/09/lines-and-curves-by-patrick-burgaud/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Burgaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=583#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Dear Jim,

Thanks a lot for your review. You point a crucial element, the difference between artistic point of view and programation. And I&#039;m very glad and proud that you appreciated it.

I dont agree with your sentence &quot;that we are not so much generating ‘our own’ version of the work as exploring what Burgaud has explored in his search for semiotic pleasure &quot;.
for the reason I did not explored the work. I just explored what I could see. For exemple, I was very pleased by the discovering of what the letter N did on my daugther&#039;s computer (a G4). Completely different from my own computer. Thus, you are more or less generating your own version of the work, and I shall never see it, never know what you got.
A part of the pleasure is in it. In what you write &quot;But it may consist of something different for ourselves than for Burgaud&quot;. It looks crazy, but I love this idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jim,</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for your review. You point a crucial element, the difference between artistic point of view and programation. And I&#8217;m very glad and proud that you appreciated it.</p>
<p>I dont agree with your sentence &#8220;that we are not so much generating ‘our own’ version of the work as exploring what Burgaud has explored in his search for semiotic pleasure &#8220;.<br />
for the reason I did not explored the work. I just explored what I could see. For exemple, I was very pleased by the discovering of what the letter N did on my daugther&#8217;s computer (a G4). Completely different from my own computer. Thus, you are more or less generating your own version of the work, and I shall never see it, never know what you got.<br />
A part of the pleasure is in it. In what you write &#8220;But it may consist of something different for ourselves than for Burgaud&#8221;. It looks crazy, but I love this idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

