Print This Post Print This Post

An Edge of Chaos

October 3rd, 2009 by shadoof | Filed under John Cayley, Uncategorized

Here is some netpoetics. I’ve found some at last. Writing digital media. Language-driven digital poesis. Digital poetics even? “Something already ?” (Tom Phillips, A Humument, p. 99)

“The purpose of this writing is to address”
“an edge of chaos.”
“Specifically, the point or points”
“in sequences of words that”
“delimit phrases”
“found to be unique in our”
“most accessible corpus.”

[Google, Sat Oct 3, 2009, completed 10:27am.]


“The purpose of this writing is to address an”
“is to address an edge of”
“address an edge of chaos”
“an edge of chaos. Specifically,”
“edge of chaos. Specifically, the”
“of chaos. Specifically the point”
“Specifically, the point or points in”
“the point or points in sequences”
“or points in sequences of”
“points in sequences of words”
“in sequences of words that delimit”
“of words that delimit phrases”
“words that delimit phrases found”
“phrases found to be unique”
“found to be unique in our most”
“unique in our most accessible”
“in our most accessible corpus.”

[Google, Thu Oct 1, 2009, completed 9:17am.]



  • Process: Write into the Google search field with text delimited by quote marks until the sequence of words is not found. Record this sequence. Delete words from the beginning of the sequence until the sequence is found. Then add more words to the end of the sequence until it is not found. Repeat.
  • Thoughts:   — The sentence used above was composed on the fly and thought out during the process of the experiment. I would now prefer to improve the composition of the sentence/thought and perform the process once again. Especially important since I would like to produce seeded permutations based on the results, viz: — Put the resultant text up on the web and wait while Google indexes it (or not, how do we know?), then perform exactly the same process again, at which point none of the resultant sequences will, any longer, be unique, i.e. they will be found.   — Alternately, don’t put any of the resultant text up on the web and simply perform the same process at a succession of intervals to see how the corpus has changed.   — The rules could be made more complex if attention were paid to, say, concatenations suggested by those searches immediately before the search that finds no results, especially if these searches produce a single result (a Googlewhack).   — Instead of a self-reflexive seed, use something intended to engage with sociocultural/sociopolitical concerns. — Instead of a self-reflexive seed, write with a found text, something pre-composed, authoritative, magisterial, dense, poetic, found (!) none of its sequences should be discovered to be unique. Use a famous (writer’s) text and an unknown (writer’s) text.
  • Process 2: Write into the Google search field with text delimited by quote marks until the sequence of words is not found. Delete the rightmost word. Record the text that is found. Continue with the sequent text in your writing. Repeat. Use this method as a way to lineate your text in a set of phrases that are found, that are not unique, that share some properties with (magisterial) text that is found.
  • Process 2a: Write into the Google search field with text delimited by quote marks until the sequence of words is not found. Delete the rightmost word. Rewrite the righthand part of the text until it produces only one search result in Google. Then continue with the sequent text in your writing trying as best you can to complete your thought. Repeat.
  • Process 3: Write into the Google search field with text delimited by quote marks until the sequence of words is not found. Delete the rightmost word. Record your words together, in turn, with three words that are sequent in in the Google search results. Make these a verse. End the verse with your own sequence (the found one). Continue making such verses until the writing is done.
  • Thoughts:   — Begin to note some of the difference between this variety of practice and other conceptualisms. This is not flarf or conceptual poetry (the history of which has now ended thanks to Kent Johnson’s Day). Algorithmic, but decidedly manual, compositional. Compositional also in relation to the media, the interface. Writing digital media. A poetics driven by language (and language use, suddenly and overwhelmingly accessible to us) but also by the inherent, emergent poetics of the net. To program the process would make it less humanly engaged but would make it no more a matter of expressive process (cf. Noah Wardrip-Fruin’s new book).   — Temporality. The process is experimental but cannot (in theory) be repeated. In theory, shortly after I post these texts to netpoetics, they will all be findable by Google. They will have become part of the corpus. Canon fodder. Found.   — Not exhausted by its concept. Couldn’t be. Perhaps because actively and temporally engaged with the media, with the net. Implies rather, a way of writing. Like Baldwin’s digital poetics. But there is, in my approach, an explicit address to literature, to the found. It’s there. I’m writing against it. On an edge of chaos.


If I write, quoting, “And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep,” these words will be found. Perhaps they will now always be found. I write, in part, in the hope that what I write will be found.


“If I write,”
“quoting, ‘And the”
“earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.’ These”
“words will be found.”
“Perhaps they will now”
“always be found.”
“I write, in part, in the hope that”
“what I write will be found.”

[Google, Sat Oct 3, 2009, completed 9:16am.]


“If I write, quoting,”
“I write, quoting, “And”
“write, quoting, “And the”
“quoting, ‘And the earth”
“‘And the earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep,’ these words”
“upon the face of the deep,’ these words will”
“deep,’ these words will be found”
“these words will be found. Perhaps”
“will be found. Perhaps they will now”
“Perhaps they will now always”
“they will now always be found”
“will now always be found. I”
“always be found. I write”
“be found. I write, in part”
“I write, in part, in the hope that what”
“in the hope that what I write will be found.”

[Google, Sat Oct 3, 2009, completed 2:04am.]


“If I write a quote, ‘And”
“the earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.’ These highlighted”
“words will be found now.”
“Perhaps they will always have the”
“certainty now of being able to go”
“on being found. I will”
“write, in part, in the hope that”
“what I write will be found valuable.”

[Google, Sat Oct 3, 2009, completed 9:26 - whacks]

  1. Rick Geneva » Blog Archive » Demystifying the Event Driven Gateway Sep 21, 2009 … For example, if I write a quote and don’t use the close quote symbol, doesn’t this leave you hanging a bit? So it’s better style to always … www.rickgeneva.com/wp/pages/201 – Cached – Similar
  2. The World vs The Bible (Science vs Religion) | Facebook In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth and the earth was WITHOUT form and VOID and darkness was upon the face of the DEEP. These highlighted … www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=45733549319&topic… – Cached – Similar
  3. Old Southwark and its people … – Google Books Result?by William Rendle – 1878 – History – 333 pages The armorial device of the Borough of Southwark is at the end of the book.8 I must remark that the same words will be found now and then to be diversely … books.google.com/books?id=Rl0JAAAAIAAJ…
  4. Cobb: Black Culture vs Economic Conditions Nov 18, 2006 … And I think perhaps they will always have the ear and attention of those groups founded by white liberals and their best black friends, … cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2006/11/black_culture_v.html – Cached – Similar
  5. Edward Thring, headmaster of Uppingham school: life, diary and letters – Google Books Result by George Robert Parkin – 1900 – Biography & Autobiography – 518 pages Five agreed to this as well as myself, and I have written to Burton accordingly with the absolute certainty now of being able to go on with the work. … books.google.com/books?id=yKFDAAAAIAAJ…
  6. Impotent boyfriend – Spicy talk educational Discovering sensual …?10 posts - Last post: Feb 16, 2004?… almost daily with whatever erection i get. i want to get married but i am afraid that on being found i will have to face shame. though i … spicytalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=614 – Cached – Similar
  7. Daily Kos: Teen Challenge: Possible missionary mill? Apr 30, 2008 … I write, in part, in the hope that no more lives will be hurt like ours were. If I can eventually keep kids from going through the same holy … www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/30/1712/32864/…/504060 – Cached – Similar
  8. near emmaus: A Critique of Speaking in Tongues: Part One: Introduction Aug 14, 2009 … I hope that what I write will be found valuable to those who are interested. If you disagree with my conclusions that is fine. … nearemmaus.blogspot.com/…/critique-of-speaking-in-tongues-part.html – Cached – Similar near emmaus: August 2009 I hope that what I write will be found valuable to those who are interested. If you disagree with my conclusions that is fine. If you want to comment please … nearemmaus.blogspot.com/2009_08_01_archive.html – Cached – Similar

“If I write a
“If I write to
“If I write this
“If I write,”

“quoting, and the development
“quoting and the OEM
“quoting and the other
“quoting, ‘And the”

“earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. These highlighted
“earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. These are
“earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.’ These two
“earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep.’ These”

“words will be found rapidly
“words will be found too
“words will be found. Your
“words will be found.”

“Perhaps they will now realize
“Perhaps they will now reconsider
“Perhaps they will now be
“Perhaps they will now”

“always be found in
“always be found picking
“always be found | lyrics
“always be found.”

“I write, in part, in the hope that no more lives
“I write, in part, in the hope that”

“what I write will be found.”

(Knowing in advance there’s no way to conceal …
(valuable to those who are interested. If you disagree …

[Google, Sat Oct 3, 2009, completed 10:21]

Be Sociable, Share!
tag_iconTags: | | |

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “An Edge of Chaos”.

  1. The above was posted to netpoetic.com along with most of the rest of these notes on Sat Oct 3, about 11:30am EST. The same process now generates the following (i.e. 21 more sequences that are not yet (they are ‘now’) in the ‘corpus’) :

    “The purpose of this writing is to address an edge”
    “is to address an edge of chaos.”
    “address an edge of chaos. Specifically,”
    “an edge of chaos. Specifically, the”
    “edge of chaos. Specifically, the point”
    “of chaos. Specifically, the point or”
    “Specifically, the point or points in sequences”
    “the point or points in sequences of”
    “or points in sequences of words”
    “points in sequences of words that”
    “in sequences of words that delimit phrases”
    “sequences of words that delimit phrases”
    “of words that delimit phrases found”
    “words that delimit phrases found to”
    “that delimit phrases found to be”
    “delimit phrases found to be”
    “phrases found to be unique in”
    “found to be unique in our most accessible”
    “to be unique in our most accessible”
    “be unique in our most accessible”
    “unique in our most accessible corpus.”

    [Google, Thu Oct 1, 2009, completed 5:42pm EST. 21 lines]

    Note that this only works – according to the procedure – because the underlying sentences of this text were not posted as a integral sequence or indexed as such by Google. (As it is posted, the text – from which the sentences can be read and which is lineated by breaking on sequences that are already in the corpus – is not recognized by Google’s spiders as a sequence.) If you tried the same thing with the text beginning ‘If I write, quoting, …’ then to produce a text following the rules – a text that is unique – or rather unique as a sequence of words in terms of Google’s corpus – you would have to add to this text.

  2. Ha. Well there’s an original idea. Well done.

    By the way, Google indexes only online documents. What gets indexed, you ask? Anything linked to any document already indexed (via busy spiders). You can also manually point Google at an online doc to have it indexed if the doc isn’t linked to some other indexed doc.

  3. Are blog comments indexed by Googlpiders?

    Not so far …

  4. I googled “Are blog comments indexed by Googlpiders?”. Your comment was indexed.

    On a related but not note, I spent this evening at the thrilling task of dbCinema maintenance. dbCinema uses Google image search. From time to time Google changes the way the search results pages are coded. Which kills dbCinema. So I occassionally have to re-write the dbCinema parsing algorithm for the search results. Yeesh.

    But dbCinema searches for stuff that’s there. I like the way your piece uses it to find out what’s not there.

  5. Marvellous! Writing on the edge of chaos, yes, but it’s also like mating with Google. Beyond symbiosis, a kind of symbiogenesis… sympoeticgenesis perhaps?

  6. This exercise ramifies. I did believe that it was interesting and had aesthetic traction but that it might only be an exercise. It seems already to be more than that.
    As Jim points out the spiders find comments but, performing these processes reveals that (Google) searches and their results change all the time. (We shouldn’t surprised but we must be; we now treat searches with authority – of many kinds.) We are not searching ‘our’ corpus, we are searching ‘their’ corpus, and we need to remember and examine this.
    History can repeat itself, deny its own procedures, our own procedures. As of ‘now’ – 8:57am EST – my Googlpiders quip *is* indexed but my original post is not indexed any longer (also Google reports that it ignores all but the first 32 words – is this new also?). So, for example, any one who is interested can, for example, use the strings of the ‘googlewhack’ version to generate the whacks again, whereas ‘we’ should by now be finding *two* results for each of the strings in this version, the second being my netpoetic post. (I did do this with precisely these results on Oct 5.) My *previous* (first) comment has still not been indexed either. You could perform Process 1 on my seed sentences and get the first iteration but you will not (yet) be able to generate the text in my comment (until the original post is indexed again). *I could not have written that comment yet.*
    I now feel obliged to go on with this and to see if, suddenly, the page returns to their corpus, their index and to find out where the procedures will lead.
    Is this a more or less critical art practice (and therefore aesthetic beyond ‘cool’ in Alan Liu’s sense) than mapping art or late-flarf-style-phrase-grabbing art. I believe that it is, and also that the texts it may render us on the way have a closer relation to those that are composed by less ambiguously human processes.

Leave a comment.

To leave a comment, please fill in the fields below.