<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Archive or the Trace: Cultural Permanence and the Fugitive Text</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netpoetic.com/2010/01/the-archive-or-the-trace-cultural-permanence-and-the-fugitive-text/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netpoetic.com/2010/01/the-archive-or-the-trace-cultural-permanence-and-the-fugitive-text/</link>
	<description>exploring digital poetry and electronic literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lori.emerson</title>
		<link>http://www.netpoetic.com/2010/01/the-archive-or-the-trace-cultural-permanence-and-the-fugitive-text/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>lori.emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=1017#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Interested in your post Mark - this ephemerality seems to be something that my undergraduates find exhilarating about digital poetry and inevitably, every semester someone will make the connection between digital poetry/e-lit and graffiti. That said, just like Kirschenbaum&#039;s efforts to bring Agrippa back from the dead and Huth et al&#039;s efforts to bring bpNichol&#039;s First Screening back to accessibility, it seems that sooner or later - regardless of authorial intent - we feel we must, we really *ought* to preserve. It would be truly radical, truly post-human of us to resist this urge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested in your post Mark &#8211; this ephemerality seems to be something that my undergraduates find exhilarating about digital poetry and inevitably, every semester someone will make the connection between digital poetry/e-lit and graffiti. That said, just like Kirschenbaum&#8217;s efforts to bring Agrippa back from the dead and Huth et al&#8217;s efforts to bring bpNichol&#8217;s First Screening back to accessibility, it seems that sooner or later &#8211; regardless of authorial intent &#8211; we feel we must, we really *ought* to preserve. It would be truly radical, truly post-human of us to resist this urge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

